Re: Protocol draft scehdule

 Jim,

In this schedule what I am not sure of is how the issues brought up w.r.to:

a) variants
b) configurations, and
c) deltas

will be addressed.

In all of these issues there seem to be lot of discussion on the topic and
no resolution or proposal for action is arrived at.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Date: Friday, September 12, 1997 3:52 PM
Subject: Protocol draft scehdule



>Here is my current proposed schedule for completion of the WebDAV protocol
>document.
>
>Sept. 24
>New draft with updates to collections and namespace operations based on
>Orem, Munich, list feedback (-03 draft)
>
>Oct. 10
>New draft with updates to lock operations based on Orem, Munich, list
>feedback
>
>Oct. 31
>Draft with no TBDs (i.e., i18n and security sections included)
>
>Nov. 12th (right before last call for December IETF)
>New draft which includes feedback from list on previous drafts
>
>December 8-12, Washington, DC IETF
>Resolve final issues
>Informal poll to determine if we're close to consensus
>
>Dec. 19
>New draft incorporating feedback from December IETF meeting.
>
>Jan. 5
>Start working group last call
>
>Jan. 23
>End working group last call
>
>Jan. 30
>New draft incorporating changes identified during the WG last call
>Call for consensus
>
>At this point, either iterate through another WG last call period, or
>forward specification to the IESG.  Either way, the protocol specification
>will be sent off to the IESG in February.
>
>- Jim

Received on Monday, 15 September 1997 14:01:28 UTC