- From: -=jack=- <jack@twaxx.twaxx.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 09:42:35 -0700
- To: "'Del Jensen'" <dcjensen@novell.com>, "mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch " <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>, "yarong@microsoft.com" <yarong@microsoft.com>, Dylan Barrell <dbarrell@opentext.ch>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Th behaviour of removing a lock when moving a resource is bound to result in overwrite conflicts due to locks being inadvertantly lost through some structural re-organisation. This will also require that only the owner of the lock be able to move the resource which is unnecessarily restrictive in a shared authoring environment where one individual might be responsible for content and another for structure. -------- I would say that a lock must be retained when a resource is moved. This is something of a grey area WRT locks and the prevention of overwriting of content. The main purpose of the lock is to maintain the consistency of content when one author out of potentially many is modifying the content. This prevention of other authors modifying the content must be maintained whether or not an administrator decides to move the entire resource to some other location. Note that this isn't dangerous to the content, unless the lock is NOT maintained. I would argue that the lock should simply be moved with the resource, which allows administrators the freedom to do their jobs without interfering with the maintenance of the consistency of content, which is the job the lock does for multiple authors. -=jack=- (This text composed by voice) --
Received on Monday, 1 September 1997 12:43:27 UTC