- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 15:13:43 -0800
- To: "'Gregory J. Woodhouse'" <gjw@wnetc.com>
- Cc: "'masinter@parc.xerox.com'" <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Sorry... hehehe.. I meant Violent not Violate. Either way, it appears we agree. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Gregory J. Woodhouse [SMTP:gjw@wnetc.com] > Sent: Friday, March 21, 1997 1:28 PM > To: Yaron Goland > Cc: 'masinter@parc.xerox.com'; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: RE: Partial Puts > > On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Yaron Goland wrote: > > > Gregory, given this post and my response to Larry's original post, > can I > > assume we are in violate agreement about how to proceed with partial > > PUT? > > Yaron > > > > Violate agreement? That's an interesting concept. Does that mean > there's a > proposed standard we both think shouldn't be followed? > > Seriously, though, I think we basically agree here. > > > --- > gjw@wnetc.com / http://www.wnetc.com/home.html > If you're going to reinvent the wheel, at least try to come > up with a better one.
Received on Friday, 21 March 1997 18:13:43 UTC