- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 20:47:16 -0800
- To: "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, "'Jim Whitehead'" <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
I am currently working on the specification to allow for searching of collection contents. Collections are sets and thus are unordered. If you want compound documents collections are absolutely the wrong place to go. As for multiple, simultaneous users of collections, what problem are you concerned w/? It is up to the server to serialize commands. Yaron >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org [SMTP:w3c-dist-auth@w3.org] >Sent: Friday, February 07, 1997 12:32 PM >To: Jim Whitehead >Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org >Subject: Re: Open Issues - Hierarchical Collections > >Here are a few other questions I had about hierarchical collections: > >It should be possible to search a hierarchical collection based on attribute >values. We might not want to provide methods for performing searches, but >we need to know that such searches are feasible. > >Can members of a collection be ordered (so that collections can be used to >implement compound documents)? > >Can many people add objects to a collection and remove objects from a >collection at once? > >--Judy >Name: Judith A. Slein >E-Mail: slein@wrc.xerox.com >Internal Phone: 8*222-5169 >External Phone: (716) 422-5169 >Fax: (716) 265-7133 >MailStop: 128-29E
Received on Friday, 7 February 1997 23:47:52 UTC