- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 16:37:48 -0700
- To: Terry Allen <tallen@sonic.net>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
>>Agreed, which is why the Depth header can take the value 0 (the collection >itself), 1 (the immediate non-collection members of the collection), >infinity (go as deep as you can). Do you see problems with this approach? > >That's not what the spec says s.v. 5.3; it lists only 1 and infinity, >and I see I misread, thinking that values in between were allowed. >I am confused by the terms "immediate member resources" (what is >the force of "immediate") and "internal descendant resources" >(not in 2. Terms). Right. INDEX is defined to return a listing of the members of a collection. In the example below: A / \ J K | Z Depth of 0 would be just A (and hence a very boring listing). Depth of 1 is A, J, K. Depth Infinity is A, J, K, Z. So, INDEX was limited to Depth 1 and Infinity so it would actually return something (Depth 0 would only report information about the collection itself, perhaps its human-readable title). The intent of "immediate member resources" is the Depth 1 non-collection resources, but the proposal should be more explicit in its language. >In either case it would appear that External Member Resources >would not be listed, yet their only sin is that they possess >an absolute URI not relative to their parent's (the collection's?) >URI. So INDEX will not give a complete listing of the contents >of a collection if some are differently URI'd than the collection >itself, even if they are on the same server. Is that right >or am I missing something? (And did you intend to allow integers >between 1 and infinity?) Urrr, I think this is a problem with the wording of the proposal. The intent is certainly to return a listing of external members during an INDEX, but I agree with you, the proposal does not clearly indicate this is the desired behavior. >And what is a "noncollection member of the collection"? An >internal member resource that is not itself a collection? Yes. I agree, "noncollection member of the collection" is a really awkward term. - Jim
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 1997 19:35:53 UTC