- From: Ron Daniel, Jr. <rdaniel@lanl.gov>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 09:15:05 -0600
- To: Dylan Barrell <dbarrell@opentext.ch>, "w3c-dist-auth@w3.org" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
At 10:02 AM 5/27/97 +-200, Dylan Barrell wrote: >I don't see any reason to support both forms of access (Why have two ways of >doing something when there is no advantage of the second method over the first) The advantage of allowing an email form of access is for people trying to work in disconnected situations. If I can check out a bunch of documents to my laptop and work on them at 30k feet, this is nice. It would be even nicer if I could queue up the edited documents for check-in by way of my mailer when I next connect. So, there are times when an email version of DAV would have advantages. Having said that, I think those situations are in the minority. Further, nobody has yet said that they are going to implement DAV in email. So, I think the WG's approach of trying not to preclude DAV in email, but not working on that particular problem right now, is just about right. Ron Daniel Jr. voice:+1 505 665 0597 Advanced Computing Lab fax:+1 505 665 4939 MS B287 email:rdaniel@lanl.gov Los Alamos National Lab http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel Los Alamos, NM, USA, 87545
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 1997 11:16:57 UTC