- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:26:16 -0700
- To: "'-=jack=-'" <jack@twaxx.twaxx.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Cc: "Henry Sanders (Exchange)" <henrysa@exchange.microsoft.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I too am coming to the conclusion that ACLs need to be part of DAV, I will take it upon myself to put out a proposal by the end of next week. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: -=jack=- [SMTP:jack@twaxx.twaxx.com] > Sent: Friday, April 18, 1997 10:51 AM > To: Larry Masinter > Cc: Henry Sanders (Exchange); w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: WEBDAV Security > > > I think the WEBDAV group is best qualified to determine the > > nature of the minimum requirements for access control necessary > > to build functional but interoperable authoring systems, > > and that furthermore we'll do ourselves a favor by surveying > > the minimum requirements of existing authoring systems. > ------------ > > Also the Andrew file system (if I remember correctly) also has > a good ACL implementation. > > > > It may be that all the 'access control' we can ask for is > > for the WEBDAV server to give the user a web page that allows > > them to change the default access authorization for a page > > they just stored, for example. > -------------------- > That's horribly insufficient, IMHO. Again look at the ACL's > from the Andrew FS, that's more like it, I think. At least > user and group access rights, similar to read write permissions > and the ability to specify basic logical op's too. > > > -=j=- > > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 1997 16:55:55 UTC