- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 10:58:52 -0800
- To: "'Judith Slein'" <slein@wrc.xerox.com>
- Cc: "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
You read my mind. I already made that exact change to the spec. =) Yaron >-----Original Message----- >From: Judith Slein [SMTP:slein@wrc.xerox.com] >Sent: Monday, November 11, 1996 8:45 AM >To: Yaron Goland >Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org >Subject: RE: Attributes in Prelim DAV Spec > >At 03:30 PM 11/8/96 PST, Yaron Goland wrote: >>>The case I'm pointing to is where one attribute itself has attributes. >>>Maybe the syntax here is just http://foo/bar<Abstract><Author>, where >>><Author> identifies the person who wrote the <Abstract> attribute of the >>>bar >>>resource. >>> >>>[Yaron Goland] This is illegal with the current syntax. It should really >>>be >>>done with Abstract.Author. Still that is not a clean solution. I have no >>>problem extending the syntax to handle this case. Thoughts? >>> >>> >Then let me propose that we make the syntax I used above legal for >identifying attributes of attributes. It probably should be legal to nest >attributes as deep as you like, although it's hard to imagine really wanting >to go deeper than two levels. > >URI = (absoluteURI | relativeURI) *("<" Attribute ">") ["#" fragment] > >--Judy >Name: Judith A. Slein >E-Mail: slein@wrc.xerox.com >Phone: 8*222-5169 >Fax: (716) 265-7133 >MailStop: 128-29E >
Received on Monday, 11 November 1996 14:05:43 UTC