- From: Robert S. Thau <rst@ai.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 17:48:00 -0400
- To: connolly@w3.org, gramlich@bigbang.Eng.Sun.COM
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
There are a few wrinkles, but I think that's one reasonable way to look at it. The same might be said of HTTP itself, I guess. Of course, we are trying to address a whole bunch of issues which most file systems out there don't handle natively, such as versioning, management of metadata with arbitrary attributes, and what we seem to be calling "source retrieval" --- that is, retrieval of a base form (say, pseudo-HTML with server-side-include directives) from which the view of the resource presented to clients is derived. To put it another way, I think a fair number of people out there would be disappointed with the results of our efforts if it were difficult to present the full functionality of a commercial document repository, or something at least very near, through the interfaces which we eventually specify. Few extant remote-file-system protocols (I'm not aware of any, but I might well not be if one is out there) can meet that criterion as is. rst
Received on Friday, 20 September 1996 17:48:18 UTC