- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 02:01:05 PDT
- To: dgd@cs.bu.edu
- CC: www-vers-wg@ics.uci.edu, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> I don't have a problem with this, except that we have HTTP PUT, and the > versioning stuff must work with it (to my mind, PUT is un-useful without > versioning, but that is (perhaps) only my problem). If we move all the > versioning stuff into a special content-type that must be processed, > versioning updates will be implemented differently from non-versioning > updates. This will reduce the ability of versioning to work with legacy > authoring environments, and _require_ special work for versioning to be > supported at all. I don't think there are any legacy authoring environments that use PUT without also using a bunch of non-standard stuff around it. Larry
Received on Thursday, 5 September 1996 12:51:50 UTC