Tuesday, 20 April 2010
Monday, 19 April 2010
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
Sunday, 18 April 2010
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- Re: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
- backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
Saturday, 10 April 2010
Friday, 9 April 2010
Thursday, 8 April 2010
- Re: URIs in QR (was: URI length statistics "in the wild"?)
- Re: URIs in QR
- Re: URIs in QR
- Re: URIs in QR (was: URI length statistics "in the wild"?)
- Re: URIs in QR (was: URI length statistics "in the wild"?)
- URIs in QR (was: URI length statistics "in the wild"?)
- Re: URI length statistics "in the wild"?
- Re: URI length statistics "in the wild"?
- Re: URI length statistics "in the wild"?
- Re: URI length statistics "in the wild"?
- URI length statistics "in the wild"?