Saturday, 31 July 2004
- RE: Is there a test suite for URI equivalence?
- RE: Is there a test suite for URI equivalence?
- Is there a test suite for URI equivalence?
Monday, 26 July 2004
Friday, 23 July 2004
Thursday, 22 July 2004
- RE: BOF Request for URIREV04
- same-document references again
- RE: Percent-encoding in host
- RE: 255 character limit in reg-name
- Re: Percent-encoding in host
Wednesday, 21 July 2004
Monday, 19 July 2004
Sunday, 18 July 2004
Saturday, 17 July 2004
Friday, 16 July 2004
- Re: 255 character limit in reg-name
- RE: 255 character limit in reg-name
- RE: 255 character limit in reg-name
- RE: 255 character limit in reg-name
- RE: 255 character limit in reg-name
Thursday, 15 July 2004
- BOF Request for URIREV04
- Re: 255 character limit in reg-name
- Re: Square brackets in query component
- 255 character limit in reg-name
- Re: Square brackets in query component
- Re: RFC 2396bis sec. D.2 editorial suggestion (further, still editorial)
- Re: RFC 2396bis sec. D.2 editorial suggestion
- Announce: New "info" Internet-Draft
- Re: Square brackets in query component
- Re: RFC 2396bis sec. D.2 editorial suggestion
- Re: Relative URI resolution and fragments: editorial comment
Tuesday, 13 July 2004
- Re: URI BOF in San Diego
- Re: URI BOF in San Diego
- Re: 2396bis - new productions
- 'file' URI conventions
- Re: URI BoF
- RE: URI BoF
- RE: [uri] <none>
- Re: BOF in San Diego?
- [uri] <none>