uri@w3.org from February 2004 by date

Sunday, 29 February 2004

• RE: fragment prose proposal Larry Masinter
• Re: FW: fragment prose proposal Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: FW: fragment prose proposal Tony Hammond

Saturday, 28 February 2004

• Re: FW: fragment prose proposal Roy T. Fielding
• FW: fragment prose proposal Tony Hammond
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Larry Masinter

Friday, 27 February 2004

• RE: Review of IETF netann Draft Martin Duerst
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Martin Duerst
• RE: Review of IETF netann Draft Eric Burger
• RE: fragment prose proposal Graham Klyne
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Al Gilman
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Martin Duerst
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Martin Duerst
• RE: Review of IETF netann Draft Martin Duerst
• RE: fragment prose proposal Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)

Thursday, 26 February 2004

• Re: fragment prose proposal Graham Klyne
• Re: fragment prose proposal Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: fragment prose proposal Al Gilman
• Re: fragment prose proposal Graham Klyne
• RE: fragment prose proposal Graham Klyne
• RE: fragment prose proposal Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Wednesday, 25 February 2004

• fragment prose proposal Al Gilman
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)

Tuesday, 24 February 2004

• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Al Gilman
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Williams, Stuart
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Larry Masinter
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Graham Klyne
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Williams, Stuart
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Larry Masinter

Monday, 23 February 2004

• Re: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Tim Bray
• Re: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Review of IETF netann Draft jcowan@reutershealth.com
• RE: Review of IETF netann Draft Eric Burger
• Re: Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Graham Klyne
• Section 3.5. Passing fragment identifiers to other systems. Williams, Stuart

Saturday, 21 February 2004

• RFC 2396bis draft 04 typo Mike Brown

Friday, 20 February 2004

• Re: Review of IETF netann Draft Martin Duerst
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-04.txt Martin Duerst
• Haskell URI handling; source code available Graham Klyne
• Re: More test cases to be confirmed Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: More test cases to be confirmed Graham Klyne
• Re: More test cases to be confirmed Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Calculating relative URIs Graham Klyne

Thursday, 19 February 2004

• Re: More test cases to be confirmed Graham Klyne
• Concern with URI normalization text; proposed change Graham Klyne
• Re: More test cases to be confirmed Dan Connolly
• Re: Review of IETF netann Draft Graham Klyne
• More test cases to be confirmed Graham Klyne
• Review of IETF netann Draft Eric Burger
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Graham Klyne
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Martin Duerst
• Re: userinfo allowed in http URI or not? Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature

Wednesday, 18 February 2004

• Relative URI resolution test cases? Graham Klyne
• rfc2396bis, section 7.6, typo Graham Klyne
• Re: userinfo allowed in http URI or not? by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature

Tuesday, 17 February 2004

• Just checking: pct-encoded in IPvFuture? Graham Klyne
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-04.txt Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: Http and RFC-2396 Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-04.txt Graham Klyne
• Http and RFC-2396 Michel Suignard
• Re: Host header Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: localhost Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature

Monday, 16 February 2004

• Re: localhost Graham Klyne
• Re: localhost Graham Klyne
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Graham Klyne
• Re: Host header (was uri handling of hosts is too restrictive) Martin Duerst
• Re: localhost Martin Duerst
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03, section 3 Martin Duerst
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: localhost Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-04.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03, section 3 Roy T. Fielding
• Host header (was uri handling of hosts is too restrictive) Stefan Eissing
• Re: "Relative URI" or "Relative URI Reference"? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Comments on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-0x Roy T. Fielding
• Re: encoding related phrasing Roy T. Fielding
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03, section 6 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: localhost Roy T. Fielding
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Roy T. Fielding
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03, section 7 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Roy T. Fielding

Sunday, 15 February 2004

• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Martin Duerst
• localhost Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Adam M. Costello BOGUS address, see signature

Saturday, 14 February 2004

• Re: remove_dot_segment in draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: non-hierarchical URIs and square brackets Roy T. Fielding
• Re: userinfo allowed in http URI or not? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Editorial comments on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03 Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 13 February 2004

• Re: ":" in pchar twice in latest draft Martin Duerst
• Re: RFC2396, parsing 'authority' and 'host' Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ":" in pchar twice in latest draft Roy T. Fielding
• Re: defaults and equivalence, same-document references Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 11 February 2004

• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Martin Duerst
• Re: ":" in pchar twice in latest draft Martin Duerst
• Re: URI Generic Syntax doc (draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03) by way of Martin Duerst
• defaults and equivalence, same-document references Mike Brown

Monday, 9 February 2004

• Re: feedback on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ALPHA / DIGIT vs alphanum Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 10 February 2004

• Re: Canonical Form of URIs "/" and IRIs Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ":" in pchar twice in latest draft Roy T. Fielding
• Re: URI Generic Syntax doc (draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Roy T. Fielding
• ":" in pchar twice in latest draft Mike Brown

Monday, 9 February 2004

• RE: SNMP URI and 2396bis Black_David@emc.com
• Re: feedback on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03.txt Daniel Barclay
• Re: feedback on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03.txt Clive D.W. Feather
• Re: feedback on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03.txt Daniel Barclay
• Re: SNMP URI and 2396bis Stefan Eissing
• simplifying URI path production Roy T. Fielding
• Re: encoding related phrasing Clive D.W. Feather

Sunday, 8 February 2004

• ALPHA / DIGIT vs alphanum Mike Brown

Saturday, 7 February 2004

• Re: URI Generic Syntax doc (draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03) by way of Martin Duerst

Sunday, 8 February 2004

• Re: 2396bis and the "/" char Roy T. Fielding
• Re: feedback on draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03, section 1 and 2 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: encoding related phrasing Roy T. Fielding

Saturday, 7 February 2004

• Re: definition of "character" Roy T. Fielding
• Re: delimiters vs separators Roy T. Fielding

Sunday, 8 February 2004

• SNMP URI and 2396bis Black_David@emc.com

Saturday, 7 February 2004

• Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: URI Generic Syntax doc (draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03) Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 6 February 2004

• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Stephen Pollei
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-black-snmp-uri-02.txt Shigeru Aoki
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Sampo Syreeni
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-black-snmp-uri-02.txt Stefan Eissing
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Martin Duerst
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-black-snmp-uri-02.txt Shigeru Aoki
• Re: RFC2396bis - implementation results using revised syntax Graham Klyne
• Re: uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Graham Klyne
• FW: I-D ACTION:draft-black-snmp-uri-02.txt Black_David@emc.com

Thursday, 5 February 2004

• Re: RFC2396bis - implementation results using revised syntax Mike Brown
• uri handling of hosts is too restrictive Stephen Pollei

Wednesday, 4 February 2004

• FYI. Was: userinfo allowed in http URI or not? Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 3 February 2004

• Re: #foo URI references jcowan@reutershealth.com
• RE: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt Gisle Aas
• Re: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt Julian Reschke
• RE: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt Graham Klyne
• RE: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt Israel Viente
• RE: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt Israel Viente

Monday, 2 February 2004

• Re: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt jcowan@reutershealth.com
• Re: userinfo%20allowed%20in%20http%20URI%20or%20not by way of Martin Duerst
• Removing null authority Graham Klyne
• RFC2396, parsing 'authority' and 'host' Graham Klyne
• Status of draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-01.txt Graham Klyne
• Re: userinfo allowed in http URI or not? Graham Klyne
• Re: userinfo allowed in http URI or not? Roy T. Fielding
• userinfo allowed in http URI or not? Kai Schaetzl

Last message date: Sunday, 29 February 2004 16:41:30 UTC