Thursday, 27 March 2003
Wednesday, 26 March 2003
Monday, 24 March 2003
Sunday, 23 March 2003
Friday, 21 March 2003
- Re: tag: and urn:tag: considered unnecessary
- tag: and urn:tag: considered unnecessary
- temporal fragments
- summary of URI BOF meeting
- Re: temporal URI fragments (was: URIBOF at IETF meeting S.F.)
- Re: temporal URI fragments (was: URIBOF at IETF meeting S.F.)
- temporal URI fragments (was: URIBOF at IETF meeting S.F.)
Thursday, 20 March 2003
Tuesday, 18 March 2003
Monday, 17 March 2003
Friday, 14 March 2003
- Re: RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit
- RE: why the special case for % in fn:escape-uri?
- Re: why the special case for % in fn:escape-uri?
- why the special case for % in fn:escape-uri?
Thursday, 13 March 2003
Saturday, 8 March 2003
Monday, 10 March 2003
- RE: Can someone answer my questions , please
- Re: URIBOF at IETF meeting S.F.
- Re: Comments on section 2 of RFC2396bis
- Re: Comments on section 2 of RFC2396bis
Friday, 7 March 2003
Saturday, 8 March 2003
- Re: Comments on section 2 of RFC2396bis
- Re: Comments on section 2 of RFC2396bis
- Re: parsing hostname -- implementation feedback
Friday, 7 March 2003
- Re: parsing hostname -- implementation feedback
- Re: How does one specify a fragment relative to base document?
Saturday, 8 March 2003
Thursday, 6 March 2003
- RE: How does one specify a fragment relative to base document?
- Re: How does one specify a fragment relative to base document?
Wednesday, 5 March 2003
- Re: How does one specify a fragment relative to base document?
- URI handling code in Haskell available
- How does one specify a fragment relative to base document?
- parsing hostname -- implementation feedback
- RFC2396 test cases
- Re: RFC2396 test cases
- Re: Can someone answer my questions , please
- Can someone answer my questions , please