uri@w3.org from February 2003 by date

Saturday, 1 March 2003

• URI Scheme Review Mailing List; URI BOF at next IETF meeting Larry Masinter
• Re: RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 27 February 2003

• Re: RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit Graham Klyne
• Three more test cases... Graham Klyne
• RFC2396bis, hier-part ambiguity Graham Klyne
• Another test case? Graham Klyne
• Re: RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit Peter Koch
• Re: RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit Roy T. Fielding
• Re: RFC2396bis, path Roy T. Fielding
• Re: RFC2396bis, hostport Roy T. Fielding
• Re: (slightly) request for URI BOF scheduling Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 26 February 2003

• RFC2396bis, path Graham Klyne
• RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit Graham Klyne
• RFC2396bis, hostport Graham Klyne
• RE: fw: questions about rfc 2396 by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: FW: Questions about RFC 2396 Graham Klyne
• Re: URI test cases? Graham Klyne
• Re: a/./b/../c Graham Klyne
• Re: a/./b/../c Tim Bray
• Re: a/./b/../c Dan Connolly
• a/./b/../c Larry Masinter
• Re: /./ and /../ S. Mike Dierken
• Re: issue 023-URI-plural Roy T. Fielding
• /./ and /../ Tim Bray
• Re: Raising a few issues in fielding-uri-rfc2396-0x Roy T. Fielding
• Re: issue 023-URI-plural Tim Bray
• Re: issue 023-URI-plural Roy T. Fielding
• Re: HTML reference in RFC 2396bis Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 25 February 2003

• RE: fw: questions about rfc 2396 Larry Masinter
• Relative file URIs by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: Raising a few issues in fielding-uri-rfc2396-0x Tim Bray
• RE: Raising a few issues in fielding-uri-rfc2396-0x Williams, Stuart
• re: fw: questions about rfc 2396 Israel Viente

Monday, 24 February 2003

• Re: "How to Compare URIs" update 3 Martin Duerst
• Re: FW: Questions about RFC 2396 Dan Connolly
• Re: URI test cases? Dan Connolly
• Re: FW: Questions about RFC 2396 Dan Connolly

Sunday, 23 February 2003

• Re: "How to Compare URIs" update 3 Chris Haynes

Saturday, 22 February 2003

• Re: "How to Compare URIs" update 3 Tim Bray
• RE: "How to Compare URIs" update 3 Misha Wolf
• Re: "How to Compare URIs" update 3 Martin Duerst

Friday, 21 February 2003

• Draft language on URI comparison practices Tim Bray
• Raising a few issues in fielding-uri-rfc2396-0x Tim Bray
• Re: RFC2396bis issue, ambiguity in RFC2732 re use of '[' and ']' ? Graham Klyne
• Re: Relative URIs without scheme? Roy T. Fielding
• Relative URIs without scheme? Jim Correia
• Re: RFC2396bis issue, ambiguity in RFC2732 re use of '[' and ']' ? Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 20 February 2003

• Re: URI test cases? Graham Klyne
• Re: FW: Questions about RFC 2396 Graham Klyne
• RFC2396bis issue, ambiguity in RFC2732 re use of '[' and ']' ? Graham Klyne
• File URI questions by way of Martin Duerst
• Re: FW: Questions about RFC 2396 Stefan Eissing
• FW: Questions about RFC 2396 Larry Masinter

Wednesday, 19 February 2003

• Re: URI test cases? Dan Connolly
• URI test cases? Graham Klyne

Monday, 17 February 2003

• Re: Incorrect references, etc. Roy T. Fielding
• (slightly) request for URI BOF scheduling Larry Masinter

Saturday, 15 February 2003

• "Lel Bruce Peto" Oil sector 90's chronology informing..1997 info@lelpeto.com
• "Lel Bruce Peto" Oil sector 90's chronology restating..1995 info@lelpeto.com

Thursday, 13 July 2023

• "äæîðä àéùéú" maya
• "äæîðä àéùéú" maya

Monday, 10 February 2003

• Incorrect references, etc. Dan Kohn
• request for URI BOF scheduling Larry Masinter

Saturday, 1 February 2003

• Re: URI (file://localhost URIs, how not to abbreviate) Al Gilman

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2003 23:54:49 UTC