- From: Kenneth G. Franqueiro <kfranqueiro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:38:00 -0500
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
- Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
FYI, the documentation has not managed to republish since the Python upgrade, even after #3213. I notice the CI workflow failed on snapshots when it was merged? https://github.com/speced/bikeshed/actions/runs/20051858469/job/57509532505 --Ken On Thursday, December 11, 2025 3:20:50 PM EST Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:09 AM Kenneth G. Franqueiro > <kfranqueiro@w3.org> wrote: > > > > RE v6, I've run a battery of tests comparing outcomes involving fatal errors in the newest version, as an FYI to anyone wondering if their documents may be affected. > > > > The following pass with v5 and fail with v7 (and presumably v6), due to issues with markup: > > Thanks for the check-over! I've confirmed as well that, yes, all of > these (except css-scrollbars) are markup errors already present in the > document, that were just silently missed before due to the parser's > error recovery. Now that Bikeshed is being stricter with its own > parser, they're getting caught and reported. Some of them definitely > produced wrong markup in the past (like unclosed <section> elements, > which wrapped the entire rest of the document in that section...), > others are more innocuous (like doing <thead><td> - no <tr> around the > cells) but still definitely an error. > > (The css-scrollbars error was an actual crasher in Bikeshed; since > fixed in 7.0.2. My testsuite is old enough that it didn't contain that > spec, and nobody else exercised that precise markup... It's tested now > in my manual tests.) > > ~TJ > >
Received on Friday, 12 December 2025 13:38:02 UTC