- From: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 22:06:50 +0400
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@unlockopen.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org, jyasskin@gmail.com
On 16/02/2022 21:14, Denis Ah-Kang wrote: > Looking at the recent pull requests, there's still an issue with the > ReSpec documents relying on separate JS files, e.g. ReSpec config. > I'll try to work on a fix soon. The fix has now been deployed and pr-preview should now work as expected. If you still get an error on the preview, please let me know. Denis > > Denis > > On 16/02/2022 19:58, Denis Ah-Kang wrote: >> >> >> On 16/02/2022 19:46, Tobie Langel wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:42 PM Manu Sporny >>> <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On 2/16/22 9:52 AM, Tobie Langel wrote: >>> > As a result we were able to completely move off of GitHack, so >>> things should >>> > be back to normal now. >>> >>> Saints, the both of you. :) >>> >>> >>> My fix was a one-liner. Denis' was a lot more involved. Credit where >>> credit's due. >> >> To be fair, the fix was suggested by Jeffrey Yasskin: >> https://github.com/w3c/spec-generator/issues/522 >> >> Denis >> >>> >>> --tobie >> >
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:07:09 UTC