- From: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:31:24 +0300
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <BC225F30-6B4A-48BF-A5E8-121AAF1DD776@verou.me>
This is fantastic! Thanks for setting it up, and huge thanks to the volunteers! -- Lea Verou 👩🏽 (she/her) Web standards (W3C TAG, CSS WG), Usability research (MIT CSAIL), Open Source 🔗 https://lea.verou.me 🐦 @leaverou > On Jul 15, 2021, at 13:30, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi Spec Editors, > > If you edit specs that rely on WebIDL to describe your APIs, you may > encounter cases where you would like to express something in IDL that is > forbidden or seemingly impossible to do. > > Based on discussions that occurred in the context of the webref project > [1], a small group of people have volunteered to serve as a support team > when this kind of discussions emerge. At this point, Domenic Denicola, > Timothy Gu and Marcos Caceres have volunteered (with Francois Daoust and > myself more as observers) - they can magically invoked in a github > discussion happening in the w3c and WICG github organizations > respectively with the @w3c/webidl-design and @WICG/webidl-design monikers. > > We're starting with these two organizations, but can extend it to others > where WebIDL is being developed as the need arises and as we gain > experience with that set up. > > If you're available to provide expertise on WebIDL design and want to be > added to that team, please get in touch! > > Dom > > 1. https://github.com/w3c/webref/ - a project that publishes curated > view of IDL fragments across Web specifications, among other data >
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2021 14:31:40 UTC