W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2021

Re: Proposed Spec Editor's CG

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:17:43 -0700
Message-Id: <B9BE72F1-52B6-4C3A-B5F6-7F2381F17853@greggkellogg.net>
Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
To: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
On Apr 13, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021, at 09:31, fantasai wrote:
>>> On 4/8/21 10:46 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>> As part of the W3C effort to support our spec editors community, I've proposed a new Community Group specifically for Spec Editors:
>>> 
>>> https://www.w3.org/community/blog/2021/04/08/proposed-group-spec-editors-community-group/
>> 
>> Hi Marcos!
>> I'm not really sure why it's a good idea to create another mailing list with 
>> the same scope as spec-prod. It risks fragmenting our already small community. 
>> Is there a reason these two need to be distinct?
> 
> There's significant excitement from people at the OpenJSF about this new community group which I think points to the value of creating it.
> 
> I do agree that fragmenting the communities isn't desirable. Could we possibly reuse the same mailing list?

Agreed. Just because a CG gets mailing lists and IRC channels automatically, doesn’t mean that we need to use them. I’d go so far as to say that the CG home page should specifically say that the group uses spec-prod for communications.

Gregg

> --tobie
> 
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2021 23:18:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 13 April 2021 23:19:01 UTC