Re: About RawGit, and possible replacements

> On 14 Dec 2018, at 01:34, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Somewhere on our (ordered) requirements list must be how to assure that we limit the risk of repeating this dis-service to those who refer to our records in the future.

Maybe we can reach out to Github about supporting setting a limited set of mine types? It must be on their radar, specially after the rawgit thing. 

Anyone got a contact there? 

Received on Thursday, 13 December 2018 14:44:01 UTC