- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 12:20:56 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <mcaceres@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Sid Vishnoi <sidvishnoi8@gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:56 PM Marcos Caceres <mcaceres@mozilla.com> wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2018, at 7:17 AM, mcaceres@mozilla.com wrote: > > > >> On 6 Oct 2018, at 4:33 am, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> And it's not a meaningful expression in > >> IDL either. (People do sometimes shorthand `Class.attr` to refer to > >> the attr for instances of that class, but another common convention is > >> to use #, like `Class#attr`, to indicate a proto-lookup rather than a > >> literal object-lookup.) > > > > Thanks for the additional details. > > So, I chewed on what Tab said over the weekend and concluded that Tab is right: the `object[“prop"]` syntax doesn’t significant value. > > I’m going to drop support for it, hopefully by the end of the week. Wait, that's not necessarily what I meant - without it, how do you refer to an enum value like "foo bar"? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 8 October 2018 19:21:30 UTC