- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:43:34 -0800
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: > There is definitely a 3 way disctinction. ReSpec, in particular, can inject > information about "issues" and tie them into github issue discussions. > These are distinct from "notes" (non-normative advice to the reader / > implementor) and "ednotes" (information the editor wants to capture and > bring to the attention of a reviewer for future action). Note that Bikeshed can do this too; you just tag the issue with the Github issue number. It still classifies everything that's a problem to be resolved as an "issue", and styles them accordingly; I think that's arguably the right thing to do. "Note" styling (green background) should be reserved for actual spec notes - additional info that is helpful to the reader of the spec. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 17:44:47 UTC