Re: rel=canonical in specs from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2017-01-26 (spec-prod@w3.org from January to March 2017)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:32:51 -0800
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>
Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDCFad1bA-jPsmBhB_kBqzrYQ9k+pcFX_q5pBuvBH_Pqg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017, at 11:54, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>> I'm looking for feedback on whether to push that approach more broadly,
>> which would entail first to add such a mechanism to other editing tools
>> (I would in particular be happy to look at providing a patch for
>> bikeshed), and maybe longer term make this part of the pubrules
>> requirements.
>
> +1 to both.

Yup, same from me.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 26 January 2017 17:33:44 UTC