- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:04:44 +0100
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
- Cc: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>, fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net
Hi all, First, thanks so much to Fantasai whose work really helped improve the UX of using specs this past year. <3 Secondly though, and sorry for ranting, but W3C is a standard org whose main output is specs. That it relies on volunteering from members and IE to improve the design of its specs is baffling. Making specs as easy to consume as possible should be paramount. I'd like to see W3C put more resources in areas that actually matter to itself, its community and the Web at large. If the UX of consuming its specs isn't one of those, then what is? Best, --tobie On Tue, Nov 22, 2016, at 16:38, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote: > At the moment, we don't have a designated point person to propose a new > design for W3C specifications in 2017. Some proposals are however > interesting, eg 108. Antonio is looking into it. > > If you're interested in driving a proposal for the next W3C TR design, > please let me know. > > Philippe > > https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/issues/108 >
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:05:17 UTC