- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:59:05 +0200
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
On August 20, 2016 at 4:43:00 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalmage@gmail.com) wrote: > The email archive link is intentional and should be preserved. While > I love using GitHub as our issue tracker, it's not appropriate to rely > on GitHub the company as our history-maintainer. Agree. I was not suggesting otherwise. > Setting up a mailing > list that receives all GH Issues mail (or just repurposing the groups > main list for that purpose) is easy. Yep, is what we do. > For actual collab, tho, Specberus allows either a mailing list *or* a > GH Issues link, as you note. Yeah, I think I need to just update ReSpec's templates to allow developers to say "we prefer feedback on GitHub... historical archive of issues is captured in mailing list X".
Received on Monday, 22 August 2016 05:59:34 UTC