Re: Some missing docs?

I don't know what's up with the documentation but there is no good easy to
reference inside of a spec other than an a tag.
On Jul 5, 2016 9:32 PM, "Rick Byers" <rbyers@google.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> The ReSpec user's guide
> <https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjh0q3Mk93NAhVl3IMKHXy4CR0QFggjMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Frespec-docs%2Fguide.html&usg=AFQjCNH52Iah4HkL_ENYsLQ6qeH0SBODNA&sig2=48W533_fpE1Etvzsb-IHQg&bvm=bv.126130881,d.amc> used
> to contain a bunch of guidance on how to properly do linking including to
> other specs (eg. [[SPEC]] vs. [[!SPEC]] syntax).  As far as I can tell,
> none of that documentation has survived in the new wiki
> <https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki>.  Am I just missing it?  If the wiki
> is indeed still incomplete, are the old docs still saved somewhere (better
> than the Google cache
> <https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZcAfTUz-uKgJ:https://w3c.github.io/respec-docs/guide.html+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca>
> I've been using)?
>
> The specific question I was looking for was whether it's possible to refer
> to the ED version of a spec (and ideally a specific anchor inside the spec
> instead of just to the whole document generally).  I'm guessing the answer
> is no, and for both cases I should just use <a> tags with explicit URLs,
> right?
>
> Thanks,
>    Rick
>
>
>