- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:06:57 +0100
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, at 19:53, Michael Cooper wrote: > There are still changes impacting publication; this version is adding > "It is expected to become a W3C Note." for a Note-track document that > pubrules rejects; the previous version did not add that, and is accepted > by pubrules. This is the one giving me pain right now but there may be > others. The output of the new respec needs checking against pubrules > before it can be considered fixed. Michael I'm sure a pull request fixing this would be most welcome. :) --tobie
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:07:22 UTC