- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:04:18 -0500
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>, spec-prod@w3.org
Shane told me to do a force-refresh and that did fix the proximate problem. Michael On 10/03/2016 1:53 PM, Michael Cooper wrote: > There are still changes impacting publication; this version is adding > "It is expected to become a W3C Note." for a Note-track document that > pubrules rejects; the previous version did not add that, and is > accepted by pubrules. This is the one giving me pain right now but > there may be others. The output of the new respec needs checking > against pubrules before it can be considered fixed. Michael > > On 10/03/2016 1:36 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: >> Okay - we have a stable ReSpec pushed that supports the new >> stylesheets etc. by default, and has a number of other changes. >> Sorry for the delay. Thanks to Marcos for all his late nights and >> hard work to get this stable again! >> >> -- >> -Shane > >
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:04:22 UTC