W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: ReSpec updated

From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:04:18 -0500
To: Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>, spec-prod@w3.org
Message-ID: <56E1C532.3000404@w3.org>
Shane told me to do a force-refresh and that did fix the proximate 
problem. Michael

On 10/03/2016 1:53 PM, Michael Cooper wrote:
> There are still changes impacting publication; this version is adding 
> "It is expected to become a W3C Note." for a Note-track document that 
> pubrules rejects; the previous version did not add that, and is 
> accepted by pubrules. This is the one giving me pain right now but 
> there may be others. The output of the new respec needs checking 
> against pubrules before it can be considered fixed. Michael
>
> On 10/03/2016 1:36 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>> Okay - we have a stable ReSpec pushed that supports the new 
>> stylesheets etc. by default, and has a number of other changes.  
>> Sorry for the delay.  Thanks to Marcos for all his late nights and 
>> hard work to get this stable again!
>>
>> -- 
>> -Shane
>
>
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:04:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:21 UTC