- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:12:26 -0400
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
On 06/08/2016 02:02 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On 05/20/2016 10:18 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote: >> On 2016/05/20 22:57, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >>> One other thought on this topic: >>> >>> I wonder if this issue is a side effect of adding more rules in the base >>> style sheet. Having more rules has the nice effect that we can factorize >>> and reuse a lot more. It provides an off-the-shelf set of rules. etc. I >>> haven't heard anyone complaining about the increase of rules in the base >>> style sheet. >>> >>> But, it also means that the pubrules requirement is increasing, ie we're >>> making it hard to change rules around table layout, pre, code, nav, >>> ol.algorithm, example, etc. Those things were never intended to be the >>> target of the pubrules checker. >>> >>> In other words, from the perspective of pubrules, there is a set of >>> rules that we care in the base style sheet while there is a set that we >>> don't mind if the authors start modifying them. Since we've been >>> increasing the second set, the rule is getting more in the way. >>> >>> Is that correct? >> >> Assuming that's correct, then what about separating the rules we care >> and the rules we don't care that much into two different files, and >> require only the former to be last? > > My reluctance for that is that it means we would have 2 files, with one under particular constraint. > > There is also the case that we're increasing the number of requests but I guess this should be seen as job security for our > system folks and the webperf group :) > > In the set of solutions, we could: > 1- have two files > 2- remove the requirement as formulated and instead make sure check a lot smarter, such as check the computed style of some of > the elements instead. > > I haven't check with Comm to see which rule they care the most. Does it need to be an automated check? Couldn't we just say "Keep styling changes localized to necessary tweaks to content and preserve stylistic consistency across W3C Technical Reports. For example, feel free to override table header alignment or add syntax highlighting classes, but don't modify styling of the header, ToC, or HTML/BODY margins and font settings." ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 21:12:59 UTC