- From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:19:28 -0500
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 3 June 2016 13:20:23 UTC
It means that the gh-pages branch is raw respec source, not static saved output of respec. Examples? Sure. http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/ for example. Basically everyone who uses respec at w3c EXCEPT ARIA / APA. As far as I know. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > On June 3, 2016 at 5:13:52 AM, Shane McCarron (shane@spec-ops.io) wrote: > > APA / ARIA is an interesting case, in that we try to not expose the raw > > ReSpec to the public. Since it is only "us" I am not super worried about > > it. But there are some groups that make their ReSpec sources public and > > encourage use. I was wondering how prevalent that is. > > Can you explain what "make their ReSpec sources public" means (or > point to some examples)? I'm not sure what that means exactly. > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Friday, 3 June 2016 13:20:23 UTC