- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:57:06 +0200
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdCLcu-jiQFJh+33kV61p6EsmNFYeWXgTHK+xCf-T0csjA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 31/05/2016 17:33, Mark Watson wrote: > > ReSpec adds the following > > paragraph > > for interfaces with an iterable declaration: > > > > /This interface has "entries", "keys", "values" and @@iterator methods > > brought by iterable./ > > > > However, WebIDL now also specifies the "forEach" method. > > > > I can't find anywhere in the ReSpec source where it adds this sentence, > > otherwise I would have provided a Pull Request. > > https://github.com/w3c/respec/blob/develop/js/core/webidl-oldschool.js#L756 Ah, I was looking in the wrong repo. https://www.w3.org/respec/dev.html links to the wrong one. So, here you are: https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/804 > > > I know Old School IDL is deprecated, but we do not have time to fix that > > for our specification right now. > > FWIW, I have set up a script that enables to convert mostly > automatically from -oldschool to -contiguous: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2015OctDec/0070.html > > If that's of interest, we can discuss off list to see if it would apply > to your spec as well. > Thanks! We are in a sprint to get substantive issues done in the coming weeks, but after that perhaps we will have time for this. ...Mark > > Dom >
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 15:57:35 UTC