- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:11:54 +0900
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
- CC: Chairs <chairs@w3.org>, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>
On 2016/05/10 01:37, Robert Sanderson wrote: > In the Web Annotation model we also refer to W3C specifications' URIs as a > means of identifying the URI fragment rules that they maintain. > For example, we currently recommend the URI " > http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/" as a way to say "this fragment conforms > to the rules of the media fragments specification". > You can see the table here: > https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#fragment-selector > > I believe that this would also fall under the change to use https rather > than http URIs, correct? > > As we intend to go to CR in the next few weeks, would the recommendation be > to change to https now in advance? To me, this usage feels close to namespaces in functionality, so it may be worth discussing whether this can be treated the same way. Regards, Martin.
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 09:12:28 UTC