W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Anolis is no more.

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:18:01 +0200
Message-ID: <557E9849.8050304@w3.org>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
On 12/06/2015 22:24 , Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> On Jun 12, 2015, at 10:17 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>> On June 12, 2015 at 4:13:53 PM, Ms2ger (ms2ger@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> If you still use Anolis, please move to Tab Atkins' Bikeshed [1] tool.
>> Or ReSpec - "because a ReSpec spec doesn't end with .bs" ;)
> Anyone thought about writing a spec for spec tools?

We've mentioned it a few times. There could probably be value in 
agreeing at least on a baseline syntax in common. I'm not sure it's 
possible though (Bikeshed and ReSpec are actually a lot closer in small 
details than they are in overall syntax). It also feels a little bit 
uncomfortably meta.

They're also JFDI projects that might not work all that well with the 
notion of standards :)

I've considered writing a Bikeshed mode for ReSpec to help people 
switch, but didn't get around to it.

Fare well Anolis, victim to the relentless progress of Web technology!

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 15 June 2015 09:18:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:20 UTC