- From: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:49:53 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 10:50:21 UTC
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 15/12/2014 01:25 , Marcos Caceres wrote: > >> On December 13, 2014 at 2:36:53 AM, Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org) wrote: >> >>> In addition to those that Tab mentioned there's also XMLSpec. >>>> >>> It's still >>> used a fair bit, but if you're sticking to "Web" specs you should >>> be in the clear. >>> >> >> I think WebIDL uses this :) >> > > Hahaha. No. > > WebIDL, unless I am mistaken, uses its own weird homegrown XSLT 1.0 > processor that converts a format that is 95% XHTML with some extra XML > stuff. In that way it is a fair bit like the ancestral version of ReSpec: > That's it. I give up.
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 10:50:21 UTC