W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Spec authoring tools

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:23:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCHqF7v3OUKHgo3Byg439XkPSDT10pc8OBtdWfvCLTfig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm currently doing some work that involves parsing specs to gather some of
> their content.
> Given that there's pretty much no standard for how specs are structured, I'm
> mostly forced to branch per spec authoring tool.
> Right now, I've identified Respec (drafts and rendered), Bikeshed and
> Anolis. Am I missing any?

There's still one or two CSS specs generated from the old CSSWG
preprocessor, but Bikeshed is basically a superset over it, so if you
can parse Bikeshed you'll be fine.

There's also Hixie's custom pipeline for HTML, and the SVGWG processor
which is entirely distinct.

I recommend talking to plinss, as he's already done a lot of the
compat work necessary to parse different types of specs.

Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 16:24:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:20 UTC