- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:31:47 -0600
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > Good idea. Ian, is there boilerplate? From pubrules [1]: "Publication as a Proposed Edited Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress." Is that what you are looking for? (There are other bits in [1] for PER's, so go to town! :) Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?year=2014&uimode=filter&filter=Filter+pubrules&filterValues=form&docstatus=per-tr&patpol=w3c&rectrack=yes&normative=yes&procrev=2005&prevrec=none#docreqs > > On Monday, December 1, 2014, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2014, at 20:26, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > > > I know that PERs are pretty rare, but we in the RDFa working group are doing 3 or 4 right now. It turns out that ReSpec doesn't have anything in the SoTD template for handling PERs really. Like reviews, end dates, etc. > > > > I am inclined to add it so that the next group doesn't get surprised like we did. Any objections? > > LGTM. > > Might want to loop in Ian to approve whatever prose is needed for this. > > --tobie > > > -- > Shane McCarron > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 1 December 2014 22:31:51 UTC