- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:39:07 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 11/11/2014 19:13 , Shane McCarron wrote: > Yes - I am aware of what Bikeshed uses as its source form. In the case > of ReSpec, I am more inclined to use the Bikeshed "output" form of the > attributes as the source form. I could be persuaded to change my mind. As a rule of thumb I don't see the value in requiring people to type data- prefixes in something that is a source document. It is meant to be easy to edit, not to conform to anything. Making it valid is the processor's job. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 10:39:18 UTC