- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:06:54 -0600
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reG8OPyDP83_Ex6J2zmFJQSc-Lo12mk9g7RG5qB7nEhiTg@mail.gmail.com>
I had a thought about this whole thing.... I bet we could incorporate automatic linkchecking and pubrules checking as well. Specrebus is coming along nicely. I realize that this isn't necessarily something people always want, but as a document gets toward publication just knowing what areas need attention could be a real boon. On Wednesday, November 5, 2014, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've modified a bit respec2html.js, the phantomjs script that allows to > build the HTML output of a respec from the command line: > https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/357 > > These modifications make it usable as a way to "validate" the > correctness of a ReSpec document: when errors or warnings are emitted > during the generation of the final HTML output, they can be printed out > (using the -e and -w command lines parameters). > > These changes makes it also possible to use respec2html.js in a > continuous integration environment where any "build" error triggers an > alert. > > I have in particular started to see how to use this in the context of > Travis CI (http://travis-ci.org), a popular continuous integration tool > plugged into GitHub. > > To set up Travis CI, you need a configuration file (named .travis.yml) > to indicate what the "build" process consists of; the > following .travis.yml does the trick for respec2html.js: > language: python > install: git clone https://github.com/w3c/respec.git > script: phantomjs --ignore-ssl-errors=true --ssl-protocol=tlsv1 > respec/tools/respec2html.js -e -w > respecsourcefiletobechecked.html output.html > > (I picked python as the environment language, but in this case, it's not > really needed) > > I have tested it on my fork of the getUserMedia spec, and it worked: > https://travis-ci.org/dontcallmedom/mediacapture-main/builds/40003971 > > I'll be looking into integrating this with our main repo for that spec > and other specs from my groups. > > I've also been looking at at applying a similar mechanism for automatic > WebIDL syntax verification (via the WebIDL checker > https://github.com/dontcallmedom/webidl-checker/) as you can maybe guess > from the build output linked above. > > Dom > > > > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 13:07:22 UTC