- From: Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:42:08 +0000
- To: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:42:33 UTC
1. Give me 3-5 adjectives for how the visual design of a W3C spec should "feel". Uncomplicated, Authoritative, Accessible 2. List the URLs to 3 specs that are representative of your WG's output (especially wrt markup and structure of the content). http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP2/ http://www.w3.org/TR/UISecurity/ 3. Do you have any documentation of your markup conventions? Please paste URLs: 4. What spec processing tools does your WG actively use? ReSpec, Bikeshed 5. What are your goals for the redesign? Would really like HTTPS-friendly document production by default. 6. Is there anything else we should know / consider? Let’s please start making w3.org and especially /TR/ available over https! -Brad Hill, for WebAppSec WG
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:42:33 UTC