- From: Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:42:08 +0000
- To: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:42:33 UTC
1. Give me 3-5 adjectives for how the visual design of
a W3C spec should "feel".
Uncomplicated, Authoritative, Accessible
2. List the URLs to 3 specs that are representative of
your WG's output (especially wrt markup and structure
of the content).
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP2/
http://www.w3.org/TR/UISecurity/
3. Do you have any documentation of your markup conventions?
Please paste URLs:
4. What spec processing tools does your WG actively use?
ReSpec, Bikeshed
5. What are your goals for the redesign?
Would really like HTTPS-friendly document production by default.
6. Is there anything else we should know / consider?
Let’s please start making w3.org and especially /TR/ available over https!
-Brad Hill, for WebAppSec WG
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:42:33 UTC