- From: Steve Glaser <sglaser@nvidia.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:22:53 -0700
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "Keator, David" <dbkeator@uci.edu>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
No problem. I'll update my pull request.
Steveg
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 4:50 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> On 16 Sep 2014 at 12:32, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> On 15/09/2014 23:37 , Steve Glaser wrote:
>>> Just created a pull request to add this.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/darobin/respec/pull/336
>>>
>>> Recent email thread -- this matches my fork and avoids needless
> differences.
>>>
>>> If you define overrideLogo, that is the URI of the image.
>>> If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoURI, overrideLogoURI is
>>> the URI of the organization
>>> If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoWidth, overrideLogoWidth is
>>> the width of the image.
>>> If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoHeight, overrideLogoHeight
>>> is the height of the image.
>>> If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoAlt, overrideLogoAlt
>>> is the alt text (default is 'Logo')
>>>
>>> If you don't define overrideLogo, the values of the other attributes are
>>> ignored.
>>
>> This sounds good but I'd like to suggest a different syntax to avoid
>> having lots of properties when in fact you're just defining one thing.
>> How about (all defaults are to what is currently used):
>>
>> overrideLogo: {
>> src: "logo URL"
>> , href: "link"
>> , width: "number"
>> , height: "number"
>> , alt: "some text"
>> }
>
> +1
>
> In fact I suggested exactly the same on GitHub a couple of hours ago:
>
> https://github.com/darobin/respec/pull/undefined#issuecomment-55716716
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:23:26 UTC