RE: respecHeader W3C logo hyperlink

Just created a pull request to add this.

https://github.com/darobin/respec/pull/336


Recent email thread -- this matches my fork and avoids needless differences.

If you define overrideLogo, that is the URI of the image.
If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoURI,      overrideLogoURI is the URI of the organization
If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoWidth,   overrideLogoWidth is the width of the image.
If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoHeight,  overrideLogoHeight is the height of the image.
If you define overrideLogo and overrideLogoAlt,        overrideLogoAlt is the alt text (default is 'Logo')

If you don't define overrideLogo, the values of the other attributes are ignored.

The overrideLogo setting overrides prependW3C.



From: Keator, David [mailto:dbkeator@uci.edu]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 1:48 PM
To: spec-prod@w3.org
Subject: Re: respecHeader W3C logo hyperlink

Perfect, thanks Shane!

Dave

________________________________

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 15 September 2014 21:38:26 UTC