- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:25:10 -0400
- To: Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
On July 14, 2014 at 4:18:55 PM, Mark Sadecki (mark@w3.org) wrote: > > There are many use cases for wanting stable, static snapshots > of our > specifications. One came up today, which is why Shane posed the > question to the > group in the first place (a user who needed to review one of our > respec > documents was wondering why so much of the boilerplate was missing > and why there > was no TOC to navigate the document with.) There are some pretty > smart people on > this list. I think we are just trying to see if anyone has put any > thought into > building an automated workflow that took master and published > a static snapshot > of it to gh-pages upon each commit. It's really not such a bad idea > and it > would have multiple benefits. I think a few people have tried with Phantom JS, but it hasn't worked out well.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 20:25:45 UTC