Re: IDL problem

That aside, I have had a change of heart about impromptu / new entries
required for publication.  I now agree that we should encourage people to
use the localBiblio mechanism.  Richard would not had hit this particular
roadblock, and the specref maintainers would not be a bottleneck.  Once the
data is available in specref, the localBiblio entry can be removed if you
want.


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thursday, September 19, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
>
> >
> > For the record, the DB didn't crash, the references added by Addison had
> syntactic issues AND an encoding issue which led the continuous integration
> system to reject the update. There was no service interruption.
> >
> > If these had been submitted sufficiently in advance, this wouldn't have
> been an issue in your case.
> Having said that, we want to update my bibliography entry generator to
> make it prettier (link below). Using it would have avoided the reference
> issues that Addison introduced. Please remember it if you are creating
> references. We are also going to point people to it so they can use it from
> the specref docs.
>
> I've pointed to it a few times already in this list:
>
> http://marcoscaceres.github.io/bib_entry_maker/
>
> I would like to hack at it during TPAC in the evenings. Would be great if
> people could help me with that.
>
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.