W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: IDL problem

From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:34:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOk_reEnUerkXau0ymXvHr7xO_+YLY77LELvi=x14GOFPD5xuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
That aside, I have had a change of heart about impromptu / new entries
required for publication.  I now agree that we should encourage people to
use the localBiblio mechanism.  Richard would not had hit this particular
roadblock, and the specref maintainers would not be a bottleneck.  Once the
data is available in specref, the localBiblio entry can be removed if you

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, September 19, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> >
> > For the record, the DB didn't crash, the references added by Addison had
> syntactic issues AND an encoding issue which led the continuous integration
> system to reject the update. There was no service interruption.
> >
> > If these had been submitted sufficiently in advance, this wouldn't have
> been an issue in your case.
> Having said that, we want to update my bibliography entry generator to
> make it prettier (link below). Using it would have avoided the reference
> issues that Addison introduced. Please remember it if you are creating
> references. We are also going to point people to it so they can use it from
> the specref docs.
> I've pointed to it a few times already in this list:
> http://marcoscaceres.github.io/bib_entry_maker/
> I would like to hack at it during TPAC in the evenings. Would be great if
> people could help me with that.
> --
> Marcos Caceres

Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 14:35:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:19 UTC