- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:22:20 +0100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Richard Ishida wrote: > That's not the problem, actually. The problem was that, although you did > much excellent work on updating the documentation for respec, I was > unable to find something that said "You must avoid using the class name > 'idl' unless you use this structure for your data...", and had to try > various things to work out that in fact that class name was where the > issue originated. Even just a list of reserved class names in the > documentation would probably be helpful. (I a problem once before with a > different class name that produced a particular effect I wasn't > expecting - i think it was 'req'.) no no no. What you were trying to do was simply not going to work (at all, ever! you should not have even tried putting Respec in there). A completely different tool was used to generate the document you were trying to publish (Anolis). -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 14:22:52 UTC