W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: IDL problem

From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:57:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOk_reFHhvhvHHqJCnWp+O0bp29wm3cTvvaJ8iTvCxyWboWvOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Wow. You're right. I didn't realize that is what had happened.  Editors are
responsible for getting documents publication ready. Staff just checks.
On Sep 19, 2013 8:55 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thursday, September 19, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
>
> > On 18/09/2013 18:09 , Richard Ishida wrote:
> > > PS: I'm really starting to wonder whether I should reconsider using
> > > respec. It's so brittle! The last three documents I've tried to publish
> > > would have been published *much* faster if I'd just used a text editor.
> > > Do we have adequate tests in place, and are they used after people
> > > tweak the code?
> >
> >
> > No one is making you use it Richard :)
> Yeah, it was not really Respec's fault.
>
> Also, I don't know why the W3C staff is being asked to prepare document's
> at this level. If an Editor wants to publish something, they should fully
> prepare the document: get it to pass pub rules, etc. and then hand it over
> to the W3C staff for a look over just to make sure it's ok. I've never
> expected that a team member would do any actual manipulation of the markup
> (as it seems really unfair and a waste of time to have to deal with such
> things).
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcos
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 13:57:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:19 UTC