- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:19:55 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Dom Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:17 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote: >> And anyhow, couldn't you have respec generate relative URIs starting with >> //w3.org/...? That way they get whichever of http: or https: the original >> page was fetched with. -T > > Not if you're doing local edits, and thus viewing it at a file: url, > as Robin said. That comes back to the point that perhaps in "editor's draft" mode respec does one thing, then in "ready to publish" mode it does another. Ian > > ~TJ > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 17:19:58 UTC