- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:30:19 -0700
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: shane@aptest.com, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins, Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Dom Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHBU6itkrDkVh3k8LPwwpzJvTL7z0ggpGhfMTRggs_bs32YHPA@mail.gmail.com>
Because on the Web everything should be private by default: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2012/12/02/HTTPS https: is the correct default choice. Have you measured the performance impact recently? It’s generally insignificant compared to all other things that slow down the Web experience. -T On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > On Aug 14, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote: > > > You are correct. Pub rules. I will file a bug with them and just hand > edit it out in the meantime. > > I disagree this is a pubrules bug. Why use https URIs to refer to these > images from TR drafts served over http? > Using https URIs has a performance impact both for the server and on the > client. > > Dom mentioned to me that editors drafts could be handled differently than > TR-ready drafts, and that respec might > be improved to generate http uris when the document is ready for > publication. Pubrules currently does not have > an editor's draft filter. > > Ian > > > > > > On Aug 14, 2013 10:30 AM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote: > > On 14/08/2013 17:04 , Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote: > > I noticed today that ReSpec generates https:// for the W3C logo and > > stylesheet. Is there a reason for this? The W3C validator complains > about > > it. > > > > Likely so you don't get mixed content warnings when viewing things on > > https pages (like the dvcs repo). > > > > Precisely. We tried the option of being smart based on where the draft > was generated, but generated drafts get moved around and things break. We > tried using // instead but too many people do things like checking drafts > from the local file system and got confused (or even just an unpleasant > experience). > > > > I doubt the W3C validator complains about this; I presume Shane meant > pubrules. That's a bug in pubrules :) > > > > -- > > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 16:30:50 UTC