W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: ReSpec and https

From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:35:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOk_reF0Mi+1kD9SMZhVTxkth-eG1Mthhekysua=bFvm-WRotg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: Shane Cell <shane@aptest.com>, "Tab Atkins, Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
You are correct.  Pub rules. I will file a bug with them and just hand edit
it out in the meantime.
On Aug 14, 2013 10:30 AM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 14/08/2013 17:04 , Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed today that ReSpec generates https:// for the W3C logo and
>>> stylesheet.  Is there a reason for this?  The W3C validator complains
>>> about
>>> it.
>>>
>>
>> Likely so you don't get mixed content warnings when viewing things on
>> https pages (like the dvcs repo).
>>
>
> Precisely. We tried the option of being smart based on where the draft was
> generated, but generated drafts get moved around and things break. We tried
> using // instead but too many people do things like checking drafts from
> the local file system and got confused (or even just an unpleasant
> experience).
>
> I doubt the W3C validator complains about this; I presume Shane meant
> pubrules. That's a bug in pubrules :)
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 15:36:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:19 UTC