W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Removing XHTML saving from ReSpec?

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:50:05 +0000
Message-ID: <512B41DD.7@nag.co.uk>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
On 25/02/2013 10:40, Robin Berjon wrote:

> For (1) there's Michael's objection that he likes to post-edit in an XML
> editor. I'd love to hear about what kind of post-editing we're talking
> about because the point is sort of that there shouldn't be any ;)

Lots of people post process documents (before or after publication) with 
xml tools, whether it's a good idea or not leads to lots of discussion 
around the polyglot spec, probably we shouldn't repeat it
for every possible mechanism for generating a document:-)

> For (2) this is the heart of the problem because if we want to stay
> valid with legacy XHTML we have to downgrade the HTML5 elements. One
> option could be to just use the HTML doctype (but since I don't really
> understand the use cases for supporting XHTML nowadays, it might be that
> this breaks something).

I think downgrading the element set used is just wrong, the choice of 
vocabulary should be orthogonal to the choice of serialisation.
If the generated file never uses character entities just use
<!DOCTYPE html>
If it does use character entities I'd suggest following
but better/simpler would be not to do that and always use numeric 
references or character data.


The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 10:50:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC