Re: specifying PR end in ReSpec?

HI Karl

if you look at pubrules, it requires an end date for the PR AC review period - This change puts that text into the SOTD section for that item.  It makes sense to me to know when the AC review period ends (minimum is defined in process) so that progressing to REC can occur once that period is complete. Yes, substantive comments are supposed to have been provided earlier - my understanding that this is a chance for AC members to raise objections (though I'm not sure it has happened in practice in the past).

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Jan 21, 2013, at 2:49 PM, ext Karl Dubost wrote:

> 
> Le 2 janv. 2013 à 12:22, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> a écrit :
>> ReSpec has support for specifying the end of LC and CR with lcEnd and crEnd.
> 
> I'm not sure these make sense either. 
> Or more exactly the end of LC and CR are "desired end" for receiving feedback, not necessary the end of the period by itself. On the Rec Track, basically documents do not exit a stage, but enter in a stage when all ENTRANCE criteria are met. 
> 
> 
>> Does it have similar support for specifying the end of PR? prEnd did not seem to have any effect and is not mentioned in the documentation. I think it should be added, similar to the others. Am I missing something here?
> 
> Is there a deadline for the feedback of PR, which is basically more a process for people who wants to communicate with W3C communications Team for example Press Release statements, etc.
> 
> Or where you thinking about something else?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Karl Dubost, a Web opener to hire
> http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
>

Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 20:44:52 UTC